This forum is intended for questions about kinetics, Surface Plasmon Resonance and the instruments related to these techniques.
GST ligand capture
- zm00040
- Topic Author
- Visitor
3 years 6 months ago #1
by zm00040
GST ligand capture was created by zm00040
Hi there,
I'm trying to capture a GST-tagged ligand with the GST capture kit. The immobilisation of the Anti-GST Ab seemed to work fine giving ~11,000RU. However when I try to capture the GST-ligand and recombinant GST as the negative control, i only generated RU of ~100 (I then tried again for longer contact time to 420s and doubling the protein conc. to 20ug/mL, but still RU ~100). Then when I run small molecules over the chip, I see no interactions with the ligand as I should expect. Any advice/things I should try?
Many thanks
FC2 immob
FC1 immob
Recombinant GST capture
GST-tagged protein capture
Binding sensorgram
I'm trying to capture a GST-tagged ligand with the GST capture kit. The immobilisation of the Anti-GST Ab seemed to work fine giving ~11,000RU. However when I try to capture the GST-ligand and recombinant GST as the negative control, i only generated RU of ~100 (I then tried again for longer contact time to 420s and doubling the protein conc. to 20ug/mL, but still RU ~100). Then when I run small molecules over the chip, I see no interactions with the ligand as I should expect. Any advice/things I should try?
Many thanks
FC2 immob
FC1 immob
Recombinant GST capture
GST-tagged protein capture
Binding sensorgram
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- reeve
- Visitor
3 years 4 months ago #2
by reeve
Replied by reeve on topic GST ligand capture
Hi,
I am not familiar with the instrument you use, and I could not see the picture about FC1 and FC2 clearly, but looks like you immobilized GST-Ab to both FC1 and FC2, so there was no reference chamber? If that was the case, the relative response can only be that small. Please immobilize GST-Ab in only one chamber and make the other the reference.
Best,
I am not familiar with the instrument you use, and I could not see the picture about FC1 and FC2 clearly, but looks like you immobilized GST-Ab to both FC1 and FC2, so there was no reference chamber? If that was the case, the relative response can only be that small. Please immobilize GST-Ab in only one chamber and make the other the reference.
Best,
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kenley
- Visitor
2 years 2 months ago #3
by kenley
Replied by kenley on topic GST ligand capture
Hi there,
I was wondering if you found the reason for the very low capture level? I am getting the same results as you saw previously so it would be great if you have any theories to solve this. Thanks
I was wondering if you found the reason for the very low capture level? I am getting the same results as you saw previously so it would be great if you have any theories to solve this. Thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- zm00040
- Topic Author
- Visitor
2 years 2 months ago #4
by zm00040
Replied by zm00040 on topic GST ligand capture
Hi Kenley,
I still wasn't sure what was causing the low level of capture. It may well have been as Reeve said because I immobilised GST-Ab to both FCs but I wanted to do this for better CTL (ctl FC then had GST bound to it). The solution was I performed the GST capture 3 times instead of just once to sufficiently bind the protein and this seemed to then give better responses. Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
I still wasn't sure what was causing the low level of capture. It may well have been as Reeve said because I immobilised GST-Ab to both FCs but I wanted to do this for better CTL (ctl FC then had GST bound to it). The solution was I performed the GST capture 3 times instead of just once to sufficiently bind the protein and this seemed to then give better responses. Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Arnoud