SPR-Pages

pagelogo
back
Poor fit on top - SPRpages
back
This forum is intended for questions about kinetics, Surface Plasmon Resonance and the instruments related to these techniques.

Poor fit on top

  • mtarca
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
3 years 9 months ago #1 by mtarca
Poor fit on top was created by mtarca
Hello. Ran this Ligand Ab. Analyte/Target- 28kD. HBS P+ as running buffer.. Sensorgram 1 having poor fit on top. (50nM). with KD 0.32 nM, high bulk RI took out top point, got 0.25 nM. Shown on sensorgram 2. Tried to set RI contant RI=0. Did not make a difference in the fitting. (sensorgram not shown). Is Sensorgram 2 acceptable? KD's look close. Kindly advise. Thanks.
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Arnoud
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
3 years 9 months ago #2 by Arnoud
Replied by Arnoud on topic Poor fit on top
Hi,
I think this is a nice and clear example of secondary binding events when you have a high analyte concentration. The 50 nM is about 156x the KD. The secondary binding is adding more analyte to the response distorting the 1:1 binding and the fitting tries to compensate by adding a buffer jump.
Leaving out the highest curve is improving the fitting. 10 nM = 40x KD of 0.25 nM.
For this high affinity binding I would suggest a longer association time if possible to get more curvature in the 10 nM concentration. We would accept the sensorgram 2.
Kind regards
Arnoud

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • mtarca
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
3 years 9 months ago #3 by mtarca
Replied by mtarca on topic Poor fit on top
Thanks Arnoud !

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: ArnoudArnoud
Powered by Kunena Forum